Showing posts with label Testimony. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Testimony. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 29, 2023

Body Language Analysis №4680: TikTok CEO, Shou Chew's testimony before Congress - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)



On 24 March 2023, TikTok’s CEO, Shou Chew testified before the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee. A portion of that testimony is included in the above video (0:30 through 1:29 & 1:50 through 2:36).

What follows is a Body Language, paralanguage, and statement analysis of a portion of this segment.

(All of the following descriptions appear below the corresponding images)

Note that from 1:07 though 1:14, Mr. Chew says, “The potential security, privacy, content manipulation concerns raised about TikTok, are really not unique to us” — he displays a morphing gesture (illustrator) which began with a closed palm-up, loosely-gripped configuration with the tip of his thumb drawn together touching/in close proximity to the other digits of his left hand… (1:08).

… and it progressed to a more closed, palm-up fist (increased hostility, defensiveness, and indignant emotional tone) as Mr. Chew speaks about privacy and content manipulation.

His statement “are really not unique to us” is an example of the manipulative technique of ‘Whataboutism’. 

Mr. Chew gestures with a variation of what is sometimes called a ‘Political Point’ with his left hand (and arm) from 1:14 to 1:17, as he says, “Ownership is not at the core of addressing these concerns.”

The Political Point is a gesture that’s relatively rare outside of individuals who are not in politics, some attorneys, public speakers, and corporate leadership/corporate spokespeople.

While the Political Point is an alpha-beta hybrid, it leans strongly to the alpha end of the spectrum. The Political Point is used in lieu of (and should be thought of as a more clandestine form of) index finger (forefinger) pointing.

The Political Point and its variations are dominant signals and are used by people in closed emotional states. These particular gestures are used by those who are not interested in listening, but who are attempting with concerted effort to advance their agenda.

From 1:17 to 1:21, Chew says, “We will firewall-protect the US data from unwanted foreign access” — as he once again gestures with his left arm/hand.

This time he uses a variation of a hand-chop. This is common in those trying too hard to appear self-righteous — and when a hand-chop is displayed in the context of trying to defend against accusations (or lies) — with high-probability, it signals their guilt.

Note how Chew’s elbow is progressively moving further out (more lateral), away from his torso as he says this (enhancing his efforts at defensiveness — but signaling guilt and feigned self-righteousness).

(Although it’s not seen in this particular example, this hand-chop with lying/guilt correlation is further amplified if the additional component of an index finger point is simultaneously displayed)

Chew states, “TikTok will remain a place for free expression and will *not* be manipulated by *any* government”, as he continues to gesture with his left arm/hand (back to a ‘Political Point’ configuration). 

In all four of these examples previously shown, Shou Chew gestures with his LEFT hand. However, earlier in the video (0:37 to 0:45), we can see that Chew is right-handed (shown here writing with a pen in his right hand).

If Chew had been sincere (truthful) in the four statements accompanying these four above-noted gestures, he would have used his dominant, right hand — not his left.

This hand-dominance/sincerity correlation is particularly true in a witness in sworn testimony (especially on such a worldwide stage), an interrogation, and when one is being accused of lying or illegal/unethical acts.

Now let’s go back further in the video. Beginning at 0:53, Mr. Chew says, “ByteDance is not owned or controlled by the Chinese government. It’s a private company. Sixty percent of the company is owned by global institutional investors. Twenty percent is owned by the founder — and twenty percent is owned by employees around the world.”

An instant before he says, “Sixty” (0:59) and again as he says the word — Chew displays two successive Contempt displays. The first is subtle, but crucial. This is an example of a microexpression as it is extremely short in duration.

The second Contempt display is more noticeable (higher in amplitude and longer in duration but still very short). Please watch the video — and use the slow motion feature, as still images do not capture the dynamics of these behaviors.

Just before he says, “the founder” (“twenty percent is owned by the founder”), Chew suppresses a smile (1:05).

Then just after he says, “the founder” (1:05), Chew displays a Loose Tongue Jut. A Loose Tongue Jut indicates the thought-emotion of “I’ve been (or about to be) caught”, “I’ve been bad”, or “I’ve just done (or about to do) something stupid”.

Although not a necessary component of a Loose Tongue Jut, Chew’s simultaneous eyelid closure serves to amplify its thought-emotions.

As he is saying, “…and twenty percent is owned by employees around the world”, Chew shakes his head in a side-to-side “no” illustrator (1:05–1:07). Please watch the video as it’s impossible to show this behavior with a still image.

As Chew says, “not” (“The potential security, privacy, content manipulation concerns raised about TikTok, are really not unique to us”) he displays an amalgam of both Disgust and Contempt (1:13).

Simultaneous with this (and beginning just prior to it), Chew also displayed a subtle shoulder shrug. Shoulder shrugs indicate the thought emotion of “What could I do”, “What do I care?”, “What does it matter?”, “What could I do about it?”

As Mr. Chew says, “not” (1:25) …

…as well as he says, “any” (1:26) (“TikTok will remain a place for free expression and will *not* be manipulated by *any* government”). Chew displays particularly exaggerated facial expressions. The expression immediately above is a form of a Duping Delight. A duping delight is a smile out of context — signaling the person’s joy-happiness in their belief that they have been successful in perpetrating deception.

This last statement of Chew’s, with its volume and other accompanying vocal qualities, highlighted with these last two highlighted facial expressions, in this context, stand on their own as particularly arrogant, self-righteous, challenging, and deceptive.

SUMMARY: Based on his body language, paralanguage, and statement analysis, CEO Shou Chew was lying during the above noted segment of his testimony before the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee last week.

Shou Chew also displayed hostility, defensiveness, indignance, contempt, disgust, and arrogance directed toward members of Congress. hostility, defensiveness, and indignant.

All those interested in learning #BodyLanguage — and using it to improve your professional and personal life, please email me (Jack@BodyLanguageSuccess.com), esp. attorneys, judges, actors, directors, crisis management, C-level executives, sales, teachers, parents, health care professionals…

Ω

Thursday, October 31, 2019

Body Language Analysis No. 4402: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez grills Mark Zuckerberg during Congressional Testimony — Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)



On Wednesday 23 October 2019, Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified before the House Financial Services Committee. He was questioned regarding Facebook’s plan to create a cryptocurrency (known as Libra). Zuckerberg also was asked questions regarding election security. What follows is an analysis of a crucial portion of Mr. Zuckerberg's testimony — specifically with Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.


As Representative Maxine Waters says (beginning at 4:18:17), "The gentlewoman from New York, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is recognized for five minutes" — Mr. Zuckerberg immediately looks down to his right (gaze toward this direction/quadrant to is highly correlative with deception, shame, guilt, and sadness/grief).

The Facebook CEO also clenches his jaw (4:18:19). This is caused by an adrenaline surge — here associated with Zuckerberg's anxiety and anger.

He also displays a significant tightening of his mid-facial muscles - specifically in thinning of his lips, and with flaring of his nostrils. This nonverbal cluster signals anger.

In this moment, Zuckerberg is experiencing a high level of cognitive-emotional dissonance — simultaneous fear and anger. 

Notice too, that as Representative Waters said, "Ms." ("Ms. Ocasio-Cortez"), Zuckerberg momentarily elevated slightly off his chair (4:18:19). If you're self-aware and honest, you'll recall a similar experience. This butt-adjustment movement (often, but not always accompanied by a slight elevation in one's chair) — particularly when coupled with the above mentioned nonverbal changes, signals a sudden increase anal sphincter tone (Yes, you read that correctly). As one's anal sphincter muscle tightens, the other (external) buttocks muscles tighten too (gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and gluteus minimus). This dynamic is secondary to fear.

Moreover, along with this sudden increase in anal sphincter tone, another change simultaneously occurs in men. It's a cremasteric-related reflex. In plain speak, when men get frightened, their testicles retract (pull closer to their body). Of course, we can't see this, but we know it's happening as Zuckerberg lifts off his chair.


Zuckerberg then reaches for his water bottle. But curiously, a split second PRIOR to drinking we see a hard swallow. The water is needed because his throat was dry. And his throat was dry because he was nervous (4:18:22). He was nervous because he was contemplating lying on camera before congress.


As Representative Ocasio-Cortez says, "appreciate" (4:18:28 / "I think you of all people can appreciate"). We see Mr. Zuckerberg display a Tongue-in-Cheek display.

The tongue in cheek dynamic may indicate several different though-emotions depending on the other nonverbals with which it is clustered - i.e., "I just won", sadness/grief, anger, "I gotcha" (you were caught), projecting sexual interest, or deception.

Notice how widely Mr. Zuckerberg's eyelids are opened here. This indicates an adrenaline surge. His forehead is also considerably elevated (although this is difficult to see due to extensive Botox treatment).


Beginning at 4:18:46, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez asks, "Ah, Mr. Zuckerberg, what year and month did you personally first become aware of Cambridge Analytica?"

Immediately thereafter, during 4:18:53 - 4:18:54, Mr. Zuckerberg displays a sudden series of rapid blinking. Blinking is a non-specific signal of heightened anxiety. It can also be a manifestation of decreased eye contact and blocking (i.e., "I don't want to look at you").


A second later (4:18:54), Zuckerberg then displays what is known as a Loose Tongue Jut. A loose tongue jut indicates the thought-emotions of: "I've been caught", "I've been bad", "I've done a foolish thing".

Although not a required component of a loose tongue jut, the blink coinciding with Zuckerberg's example seen here, acts as an amplifier for these underlying thought-feelings.


Zuckerberg then immediately begins to say a drawn-out, "ahhh" 4:18:54 — note as he's saying this, his lips wrap tightly around his upper and lower teeth in the initial stages of a display known as an Inward Lip Roll. This particular inward lip roll is also stretched out in time (duration).

An inward lip roll is a sign that the psyche is trying to suppress the growth of both the emotions (inward) as well as the corresponding facial expressions (outward). 


A split-second later we see the end-point of the typical, more fully manifested, inward lip roll (4:18:55) as he says (first of the two stutters), "I'm" ("ahhh, I'm not, I'm not sure of the exact — time but it was probably — around the time when it became public. I think it was around March of Twenty-Eighteen. I, I could be wrong though."

Zuckerberg's stuttering throughout his testimony is a nonspecific but highly reliable signal of his anxiety (It's, of course, important to exclude stuttering as a speech disorder).


A second later (4:18:56) he displays a highly characteristic facial expression wherein his whole forehead (as a unit) moves downward - while, simultaneously, his inner (central/medial) forehead is contracted together and is pulling upward. This opposite direction-dynamic is a red flag.

Also, crucially, there is a subtle yet profoundly significant mouth smile - that's being suppressed. Do you see it? His feigned concern?

Zuckerberg's sudden head jerk-tilt together with the suppressed smile is forced and feigned. It occurs just as he says his second, "not" ("... I'm not, I'm not sure of the exact time..."). Note this is not a head shake (i.e., not a side-to-side, "no"), but rather a quick jerk-tilt of the head and neck.


You may have also notice that Zuckerberg looked away from Rep. Ocasio-Cortez - AND closed his eyes as he answered. Both of these are manifestations of decreased eye contact (correlative with deception). 


Beginning at 4:19:07, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez asks, "When did Facebook COO, Sheryl Sandberg become aware of Cambridge Analytica?"

Mr. Zuckerberg answers, "I, I don't know off the top of my head."

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez responds, "You don't know."

As Ms. Ocasio-Cortez is saying, "You don't know", notice Zuckerberg's mouth. His jaw thrusts forward while at the same time his lips also pinch forward in a subtle Forward Lip Purse (4:19:15). This is a common cluster facial tell for Zuckerberg.

The Jaw Jut is a manifestation of an adrenaline surge (often, although not always due to anger).

The forward lip purse tells us that the Facebook CEO is withholding information — a signal of a clandestine disagreement and/or a clandestine plan. It also is a sign that *he believes* he has a good chance of success with his undisclosed plan. It also shows us that *he believes* he's an alpha relative to anyone else in the room.


During this Forward Lip Purse/Jaw Jut Cluster, Zuckerberg continued his significantly high blinking frequency (heightened anxiety and diminished eye contact with Rep. Ocasio-Cortez).


The next question (beginning at 4:19:15) Rep. Ocasio-Cortez asks is, "And did anyone on your leadership team know about Cambridge Analytica prior to the initial report by The Guardian on December 11th, 2015?"

Zuckerberg's lips once again pull tightly over his upper and lower teeth (4:19:24). This dynamic demonstrates great hesitancy in wanting to talk. His psyche (and lips) are trying to hold his words in his mouth.


Before he answers, Zuckerberg's tongue once again juts out (another Loose Tongue Jut) — in a second nonverbal confessional display of: "I've been caught", "I've been bad", "I've done a foolish thing".

A split-second after this tongue jut, did you notice Zuckerberg again elevated off his chair? (displaying another, more subtle, butt adjustment/sphincter tightening/cremasteric fear reflex). Please watch the video, as the still images do not capture this dynamic.


Zuckerberg then proceeds to say, "Ah, congresswoman, I [stretched-out 'I'], I believe so — that some folks were, were ah [pause, blink] tracking it internally."

During 4:19:30, he stutters and pauses. Then, a split second after he says, "ah" ("that some folks were, were ah"), he blinks. This is Zuckerberg hesitating to disclose information. He's in a moment of cognitive-emotional dissonance. He's not sure what to say.

Zuckerberg's use of the word, "folks" in this context is theatrical. He's trying to appear disarming, humble, and simple — as if these, "folks" were just kinda moseying along and free to do what they wanted.


Just after he said, "internally", Zuckerberg once again displays the cluster of eyelid closure (blocking/decreased eye contact/anxiety), forward lip purse (clandestine plan/undisclosed disagreement/I'm alpha and you're beta), together with a jaw jut (adrenaline surge), (4:19:31).


Just after Rep. Ocasio-Cortez asks, "When was this issue discussed with your board member, Peter Thiel?", Zuckerberg's eyelids opened very widely (adrenaline surge from anger), his lips thinned (anger), and his jaw jutted out once more (adrenaline surge) (4:19:46).


He says, "Ah, Congresswoman, I don't, I don't know that off the top of my head", and displays yet another cluster of jaw jutting, lip pursing, and eyelid closing (4:19:51).

Zuckerberg's repeated use of the colloquial, "I don't know that off the top of my head", is another attempt to insert plausible deniability.


After he attempts to clarify his answer regarding the question about Peter Thiel, Zuckerberg again significant displayed anger (4:20:05).

Zuckerberg's verbal response is full of stuttering and misspeaking: "Well Congresswoman, I'm — sure we, we discuss [sic] it after — it ah, after, after we, we were aware of what happened." Note also the wiggle room Zuckerberg allowed by saying, "I'm sure we discuss [sic] it" — rather than, "Yes. We did discuss it".


After he finishes his answer regarding Facebook board member Peter Thiel, Zuckerberg looks down to his right (with both his eyes and his head/neck) — the quadrant associated with deception, shame, guilt, and sadness/grief).

You'll note that Zuckerberg uses the title, "Congresswoman" quite often. On its surface, this formality may initially appear to some people as a simple way to show respect (as of course, he should) — but he uses it much too often. When used excessively, such a spoken title has the opposite effect. It's patronizing and passive-aggressive. Also, if he were sincere, he would add Representative Ocasio-Cortez's name after her title. Moreover, saying "Congresswoman" repeatedly is also a method for Zuckerberg to steal a couple extra seconds in which to formulate his answer.

SUMMARY: Based on Mark Zuckerberg's nonverbal, verbal, and paralanguage behavior displayed during this portion of his recent testimony before congress, with very high probability, he lied regarding Cambridge Analytica. With high probability, Zuckerberg also lied about Sheryl Sandberg's and Peter Thiel's knowledge of Cambridge Analytica.


Media Inquiries and Keynote Appearances 
One-on-One and Online Courses Available 


Post Script: A friend of mine who's a real estate professional was recently assaulted. She was showing a house to a man and she misinterpreted nonverbal warning signs. At her behest, I'm reducing my Body Language teaching fee by 67% for any individual or Real Estate company who's interested. These can be conducted on-site, or remotely via video chat. Please email me for more information.

See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 4392: The Secret Tells behind Donald Trump's Statement, "No Puppet. No Puppet. You're the Puppet" 

Body Language Analysis No. 4391: Donald Trump, Buzz Aldrin, and Variations on the 'Side-Eye'

Body Language Analysis No. 4390: Mike Pence visits 'Detention Center' in McAllen, Texas

Body Language Analysis No. 4389: Jeffrey Epstein's Default Expression

Body Language Analysis No. 4388: Donald Trump regarding Drowned Father and Daughter in the Rio Grande

Body Language Analysis No. 4387: Donald Trump Welcomes Foreign Interference in US Elections 

Body Language Analysis No. 4336: Alita: Battle Angel, Large Eyes, and Sexual Attraction

Body Language Analysis No. 4332: Richard Nixon, Nikita Khrushchev, and The Kitchen Debate

Body Language Analysis No. 4298: LeBron James Walks Out of Post Game Press Conference after Game One Loss


________________________

Friday, May 10, 2019

Body Language Analysis No. 4385: William Barr Testimony - Part II - Senate Judiciary Committee - 1 May 2019 - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)




This is the second nonverbal analysis of Attorney General William Barr's 1 May 2018 testimony. Barr was testifying under oath before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary regarding the Justice Department’s Investigation of Russian Interference with the 2016 US Presidential Election.

Since this appearance, the Barr has refused to appear before the House Judiciary Committee - which was scheduled for 2 May 2019.

In addition, following President Trump’s declaration of executive privilege, the Justice Department declared it will not be complying with the House's subpoena for the full Mueller Report.

What follows is a nonverbal analysis of a second crucial portion of William Barr's Senate testimony and his exchange with Senator Kamala Harris (please see the first of the cross-reference links below for the initial analysis of this series).

KAMALA HARRIS (continuing at 1:39): My question - is in reaching your conclusion - did you personally review all of the underlying evidence?

WILLIAM BARR: Ah, no. We took - a, and accepted -

KAMALA HARRIS (over-talking): Did, did, did -  

WILLIAM BARR (over-talking): We accepted -

KAMALA HARRIS (over-talking): - did Mr. Rosenstein?

WILLIAM BARR (over-talking): - statements. No [quietly]. We accepted the statements in The Report as the factual record. We did not go underneath it - to see whether or not they were accurate. We accepted it as accurate. And made our - made our decision -

KAMALA HARRIS (over-talking): So you accepted, you accepted The Report as the evidence?

WILLIAM BARR: Yes.

KAMALA HARRIS: You did not question or look at the underlying evidence that supports the conclusions in the report? 

WILLIAM BARR: No.

KAMALA HARRIS: Did, ah, Mr. Rosenstein review the evidence that underlines and supports the conclusions in the report? To your knowledge? 

WILLIAM BARR: Not to my knowledge. We accepted the statements in The Report -

KAMALA HARRIS (over-talking): Did anyone in your -

WILLIAM BARR (over-talking): - and the characterization of the evidence as true.

KAMALA HARRIS: Did anyone in your executive office review the evidence supporting The Report?

WILLIAM BARR: No.

KAMALA HARRIS: No. Yet you represented to the American public that the evidence was not, 'sufficient to support an obstruction of justice offense'.


As Barr says, "see" ("We did not go underneath it - to see") during 2:01, he displays a Lip Curl.

A Lip Curl is a signal of:

• Braggadocio
• Bravado
• Hubris
• Bluster

A lip curl often has an accompanying verbal component of a slight lisp (in people who don't otherwise exhibit a lisp) - which can be heard as William Barr says, "see".


A prolonged eyelid closure (prolonged false blinking) is exhibited during 2:13, just as Kamala Harris says, "that supports the" ("You did not question or look at the underlying evidence that supports the conclusions in the report?"). This lasts for a full second. A normal blink has a duration of 0.100 to 0.150 seconds (with some exceptions, as long as 0.400 seconds).

Such long duration blinking is a form of diminished eye contact. In so doing, Barr is momentarily psychologically blocking Harris - and her confrontation.


During 2:15, just after he says, "No", Barr display an expression of Contempt. It's a bit difficult to see from this camera angle - as it's asymmetrically focused on the right (far) side of his face (a contraction and elevation of the right mouth corner and right half of his 'mustache area'). The rotation of his head partially obstructs our view. However, if you view the video at 1/2 and then 1/4 speed, you'll see it more easily. Next, watch it again at regular speed - and it will jump out at you.


A second later, during 2:16, if you look carefully, you'll see Barr clenching his jaw (circled above in red). In this cluster-context, such jaw clenching signals his anxiety. Watch this at 1/4 and 1/2 speeds as well as normal speed.


A Forward Lip Purse is displayed by Barr (2:25) just after Harris asks, "Did, ah, Mr. Rosenstein review the evidence that underlines and supports the conclusions in the report?"

A Forward Lip Purse signals a clandestine plan and/or an undisclosed disagreement. It's only displayed by people who believe they are the alpha person in the exchange. It's also a sign that they believe they have a significant probability of success.


Senator Harris then further focuses her line of questioning. Just after she says, "Did anyone in your executive...", Attorney General Barr displays an Inward Lip Roll (2:33).

An Inward Lip Roll (ILR) is an attempt by our subconscious/edge-of-conscious mind to suppress both the inward crescendo of emotions - as well as their corresponding outward (facial) expressions.


In the next second, we see a Barr display a Lateral Lip Purse (2:34). When a Lateral Lip Purse (LLP) immediately follows an Inward Lip Roll - it's a perfect example of a nonverbal sentence (aka a "Cluster"). In this context, a Lateral Lip Purse tells us that he's deciding on a course of action, and what, exactly, he's going to say regarding the thought-emotion of which he was trying to suppress in the prior second. These nonverbal juxtapositions have an extremely high correlation with deception and clandestine behavior.


Senator Harris then asks, "Did anyone in your executive office review the evidence supporting The Report?" and Barr answers, "No" (2:40 - 2:41) as he barely shakes his head, side-to-side. Yet, immediately following (during 2:41 - 2:42), as Senator Harris says, "No.", he immediately morphs - moving his head up-and-down rapidly, in affirmation. This verbal-nonverbal contradictory behavior is profoundly telling - and indicative of deception.

Please watch this particular behavior at regular speed as well as in slow motion, several times.


A second later, during 2:43, Barr displays a short burst of very rapid blinking. He repeats this during 2:46. This nonverbal behavior is highly correlated with anxiety.


SUMMARY: Attorney General William Barr's nonverbal, verbal, and paralanguage behavior analyzed in this exchange indicates he lied, under oath, to Senator Kamala Harris when he denied that anyone in his executive office had reviewed - at least a portion of - the evidence contained in the Mueller Report.


Media Inquires and Group Appearances 
One-on-One and Online Courses Available 

See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 4384: William Barr's Testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on 1 May 2019

Body Language Analysis No. 4383: William Barr's 27 March 2019 Senate Testimony

Body Language Analysis No. 4382: Why is Donald Trump Leaning Forward?

Body Language Analysis No. 4381: Trump 'jokes' about staying in office for "at least for 10 or 14 years"

Body Language Analysis No. 4380: Tiger Woods Wins his first Masters in 14 years

Body Language Analysis No. 4379: Katie Bouman, Black Holes, and Emotional Processing

Body Language Analysis No. 4376: Jacinda Ardern and Donald Trump - a Study in Contrasts

Body Language Analysis No. 4367: Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer Argue in the Oval Office - The Border Wall and Government Shutdown

Body Language Analysis No. 4323: Part II - Trump Putin Helsinki Summit Press Conference


_______________________

Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Body Language Analysis No. 4383: William Barr's 27 March 2019 Senate Testimony - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)



Earlier today, The Washington Post reported that on 27 March 2019 - three days after William Barr released his four-page summary of Robert Mueller's report - Mueller wrote a letter to the Justice Department. He complained to the Attorney General that Barr's summary of Mueller's investigation of President Trump “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of his investigation. Robert Mueller followed up the next day with a 15-minute phone call with Barr.

What follows is a nonverbal analysis of a crucial portion of U.S. Attorney General William Barr's Testimony before the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (aka 'CJS Subcommittee') on 10 April 2019.

CHRISTOPHER VAN HOLLEN [over-talking, continuing at 1:50:10]: Did, Did Bob Mueller support your conclusion?

WILLIAM BARR: I don't know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion.

CHRISTOPHER VAN HOLLEN: So, in your, in your June Twenty Eighteen memo, you indicated a President can commit Obstruction of Justice in the classic sense - ah, of sabotaging a proceeding's truth-finding functions ...


During 1:50:13 - 1:50:14, as he says, "Bob Mueller supported", the Attorney General scoots forward in his chair. Upon being asked a pointed question, Barr's Chair Squirm/Butt Adjustment is indicative of High Anxiety.


As Senator Van Hollen says, "conclusion" and immediately thereafter (1:50:15), William Barr twice closes his eyes for over a second. This is not at all typical blinking. These pseudo-blinks are blocking behaviors. Barr is Psychologically Distancing himself from what he's saying (and from what he's hearing himself say).


At the end of his statement, "I don't know whether Bob Mueller supported my conclusion" - Barr intertwines his fingers. This interdigitation signals simultaneously his Anxiety and his attempt at controlling it.

He also raises his elbows and shoulders while momentarily foreshortening his neck (1:50:16 - 1:50:17). This dynamic illustrates Low Emotional Confidence and Anxiety. His upper back muscles are tensing-up as his nervousness crescendos.


He repeats this elbow-lift/shoulder lift/neck shortening during 1:50:18, as Senator Van Hollen says, "June" (1:50:18) - fingers still intertwined.


If we zoom in on Barr, scrutinizing his eyes - overlapping with this moment (1:50:17 - 1:50:18), we see the Attorney General looking down to his right. This is the quadrant to which most people look during stressful emotional moments associated with Sadness, Guilt, and Deception.


During 1:50:18, as Senator Van Hollen says, "Twenty" ("June Twenty Eighteen"), Barr displays a classic Disgust expression.


A second later (1:50:19), as Senator Van Hollen says, "Eight" ("June Twenty Eighteen memo"), Attorney General Barr's Disgust morphs into Contempt.

Please view this portion of the video at regular speed, then at 1/2, at 1/4 - and then again at regular speed. Repeat this cycle several times to capture the full dynamics and the nuance of each expression.


SUMMARY: Taken in toto, William Barr's above-described body language cluster is highly indicative of deception. The nonverbal behavior in this exchange completely supports the implication in today's Washington Post that the United States Attorney General lied during his sworn testimony to Congress.


Media Inquires and Group Appearances 
One-on-One and Online Courses Available 
                                       

See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 4382: Why is Donald Trump Leaning Forward?


Body Language Analysis No. 4381: Trump 'jokes' about staying in office for "at least for 10 or 14 years"


Body Language Analysis No. 4380: Tiger Woods Wins his first Masters in 14 years

Body Language Analysis No. 4379: Katie Bouman, Black Holes, and Emotional Processing 

Body Language Analysis No. 4378: William Barr questioned before House Subcommittee regarding The Mueller Report 

Body Language Analysis No. 4377: Donald Trump, "These aren't people, these are animals"

Body Language Analysis No. 4354: Mass Shooting at Pittsburgh Synagogue

Body Language Analysis No. 4332: Richard Nixon, Nikita Khrushchev, and The Kitchen Debate


_________________________

Wednesday, April 11, 2018

Body Language Analysis No. 4257: Mark Zuckerberg Testifies Before The Senate - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)



On Tuesday, Facebook's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg testified before the Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees. What follows is a nonverbal analysis of but two key moments of his five-hour testimony. Included here is a nuancing of a nonverbal signal that most casual observers would conflate - however, their meanings are profoundly different.

SENATOR CRUZ (continuing at 1:18): Well Mr. Zuckerberg, I will say there are - a great many - Americans who I think are deeply concerned that, that Facebook and other tech companies are engaged in a pervasive pattern of bias and political censorship. Ah, There have been numerous instances with Facebook ...


During 1:36, as Senator Cruz says, "... Facebook ...", Mr. Zuckerberg displays a Tight Tongue Jut. A tight tongue signals the thought emotions of:

• Disdain
• Disgust
• Repulsion

With a Tight Tongue Jut, the mouth is barely opened - but the tongue is pushed out through closed lips. It's helpful to think of this as an adult analog to an infant rejecting creamed asparagus.

Notice also his nostril flaring and tension in the region above the upper lip/below the nose (the "mustache area").

In this specific example, it's not possible to differentiate if Mr. Zuckerberg's emotions are directed at the Senator from Texas - or toward the accusations/in defense of the company he co-founded (or both).

Now on a bit further ...

SENATOR CRUZ (continuing at 2:54, over-talking): So, let me, let me, let me ask this question: Are, are you aware of any ad or page that has been taken down from Planned Parenthood?

MR. ZUCKERBERG: Senator, I, I'm not. But let me just - can I [stutter] f- finish?

SENATOR CRUZ: (over-talking) How about moveon.org?

MR. ZUCKERBERG: Sorry?

SENATOR CRUZ: How about moveon.org?

MR. ZUCKERBERG: I'm not specifically aware of those cases.

SENATOR CRUZ: (over-talking) How about any Democratic candidate for office?

MR. ZUCKERBERG: I, I'm not specifically aware. I mean I, I'm, I'm not n-, I'm not sure Ω


During 3:18 - just after Mr. Zuckerberg said, "I, I'm not specifically aware. I mean I, I'm, I'm not n-, I'm not sure" - Mark then displays a Loose Tongue Jut (notated in the dialog by the Ω symbol). A Loose Tongue Jut transmits the thought emotions of:

• "I've been bad"
• "I've been caught"
• "I've done a stupid thing" (Navarro).

Contrast this with the Tight Tongue Jut shown earlier. Note that in the Loose Tongue Jut - as the tongue protrudes out - the mouth is partially opened.


A split second later - also during 3:18 - Mr. Zuckerberg displays an Inward Lip Roll (ILR). An Inward Lip Roll is a signal of the psyche suppressing strong emotions - both from being expressed on the face - but also inwardly from growing even stronger.

What emotion you ask?


Another split-second later (still during 3:18) - we see Mark Zuckerberg's jaw jutting forward (A Jaw Jut) This is secondary to an adrenaline surge accompanying anger. Note also the wrinkling/dimpling on the anterior (front) aspect of his chin.


Media Inquiries and Keynote Appearances 
One-on-One and Online Courses Available 


See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 4256: President Trump's Reaction to FBI Raid on Michael Cohen's Home, Office, and Hotel Room

Body Language Analysis No. 4254: Tony Robbins, Nanine McCool, and the #MeToo Movement

Body Language Analysis No. 4252: Donald Trump says he didn't know about Stormy Daniels payment

Body Language Analysis No. 4250: Donald Trump, "We've been very tough on Russia"

Body Language Analysis No. 4244: Stormy Daniels' 60 Minutes Interview

Body Language Analysis No. 4209: Emma Gonzalez, Florida HS Shooting, and Emotional Processing

Body Language Analysis No. 4175: Senator Dick Durbin Regarding President Trump's "Shithole Countries" Remarks

Body Language Analysis No. 4132: Drake's Tattoo of Denzel Washington

Body Language Analysis No. 4026: Aubrey Plaza, Ingrid Goes West, and Emotional Intelligence


_______________________________