Showing posts with label Behavior. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Behavior. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Body Language Analysis No. 4270: Donald Trump Brushes Dandruff off Emmanuel Macron - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTO)




Donald Trump is hosting Emmanuel Macron in the first State visit of the American's President's Administration. On Tuesday, while with his French counterpart, President Trump displayed multiple nonverbal faux pas - one of which is analyzed here.

Beginning at 0:00, President Trump says, "Mr. President, they're all saying what a great relationship we have and they're actually correct, it's not fake news - finally it's not fake news - so, it's a great honor - great honor that you're here. But we do have a very special relationship - in fact, I'll get that little piece of dandruff off [mumble, laugh] little piece - We have to make him perfect. He is perfect. So it is really, ah - it is really great to be with you and you are a special friend. Thank you. Thank you."




During 0:16 - 0:18, President Trump brushes an alleged piece of dandruff off of Macon's left lapel - three times with his right index finger - and then his with the rest of his hand off of his left shoulder - and follows it up with a touch on Macron's left elbow (0:20).

This short display is rife with body language blunders - and messages.

• The act of brushing dandruff, lint, dirt, etc. off another person is called "grooming" - and the vast majority of the time, such an act between adults (non-relatives) signals affection and/or physical attraction. This is particularly true when this violation of personal/intimate space is performed without permission - which is exactly what Trump did here.

Yet, it's not that simple ...

• It's highly doubtfully there was dandruff on Macron. Trump most likely fabricated this flaw in order to rationalize violating the French President's personal/intimate space.

• If there truly was dandruff on Macron's lapel, why call attention to it? Even if you were alone with another person - doing so would very often be ill-advised. And this act is particularly true - with a Head of State - in the Oval Office - in front of reporters - on live television.

So why did President Trump do this?

• To verbally embarrass Macron
• To physically violate Macron's personal space/intimate space
• To exert dominance over him
• It's a symptom of Narcissistic Personality Disorder

But most importantly:

• This violation of Emmanuel Macron's personal/intimate space, in large measure, is yet another manifestation of Donald Trump's Impulse Control Disorder. Although in this example it's not sexually-motivated, this behavior is very similar to what then Candidate Trump exemplified when, captured on the Access Hollywood tape, he said:

"I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything."


Summary: While such a public display of grooming is typically a sign of affection and/or sexual attraction - whether the dandruff was fictitious or real, Donald Trump's grooming of Emmanuel Macron was motivated by Trump's desire to embarrass, dominate, and belittle him. The American feels threatened by the French leader. It's also indicative of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Although some people may find Trump's action amusing, it's of profound importance - for this violation of Macron's personal/intimate space is one more glaring symptom of Trump's impulse control disorder.


Group Appearances and One-on-One
Online Courses Available 
702-239-8503
Jack@BodyLanguageSuccess.com


See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 4269: Michael Cohen and the Joker Smile 

Body Language Analysis No. 4267: Donald Trump and Pretending to Pray 

Body Language Analysis No. 4264: Criminal Profiling • Sketch of Man Who Allegedly Threatened Stormy Daniels (Stephanie Clifford) Over Her Affair with Donald Trump 

Body Language Analysis No. 4262: Wendy Vitter, the U.S. District Court, and Brown v. Board of Education 

Body Language Analysis No. 4231: Sam Nunberg Interview (Part III) • Diminished Impulse Control, Frustration, and Anxiety 

Body Language Analysis No. 4198: Lupita Nyong'o, Black Panther, and Attention to Detail

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3873: Brie Larson's Eyes, The Bachelor, and the Edge of Consciousness

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3823: Nina Dobrev, Flyboarding, Laughter and a Rapport/Bonding Amplifier

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3523: Jaws - "You're Going to Need a Bigger Boat"


______________________________

Thursday, March 1, 2018

Body Language and Medical Analysis No. 4221: Why are Donald Trump's Pupils So Dilated? - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (PHOTOS)



Why are Donald Trump's pupils intermittently so Dilated?

You probably haven't noticed, but President Trump's pupils are intermittently much larger than normal (the intermittent pattern is crucial). From a medical standpoint, this is not at all subtle or to be dismissed - on the contrary, it is glaring. Sirens Blaring. Red flashing lights. 

I write this article with the expertise of both an ophthalmologist as well as a body language expert.

In the image above Trump's pupils are approximately 8.0 mm. The dark-adapted eyes of a healthy 12-year-old may have 8.0 mm pupils - but in an unmedicated 70-year-old with healthy eyes, in a well-lit room - the statistical odds of such large pupil size approaches zero. 


Why is this significant? Dilated pupils, to this degree, would not occur in a 70-year-old, in a well-lit room unless there is either disease, injury or a pharmacologic cause present. Trump's pupils are frequently but intermittently this large (sometimes they are indeed within normal size limits).

Trump's enlarged pupils are much less likely a sign of a significant undiagnosed or undisclosed medical condition - and much more likely, a side effect of a drug/medication (one of a relatively small group of drugs).

Pupils react to both Light and Near Focusing - but also change with age


Most people know that exposure to light causes the pupils to constrict. However, you may not know that focusing on an object close up (e.g., when reading) will also cause pupils to constrict. These physiologic findings are normal for all healthy eyes. We cannot medically test for these stimuli (response to a bright light or response to focusing at near) on Donald Trump by evaluating available video or photos - however, at least with response to light, we can make some reasonable estimations.

You also may not realize that, under equal lighting conditions, pupils will become smaller with age. Thus an infant has much larger pupils than a 70-year-old. This change, generally speaking, isn't very noticeable (for most casual observers) until a person reaches their 30s or 40s - and even then it's not dramatic. But certainly, this difference is much more noticeable in a 71-year-old.

Donald Trump's pupils are very frequently larger (often much larger) than they should be for healthy eyes of his age. His pupils are very often as large as they would be if they were medically dilated by an ophthalmologist (with eye drops, such as Tropicamide and Phenylephrine).


As a control, we can compare Trump's pupils to those who have interviewed him, and are under the same light conditions. In the images immediately above and below, we see Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson during a 15 March 2017 interview. 

Trump's pupils are approximately 5.0 mm in diameter while Carlson's are 3.0 mm.  Carlson is 23 years younger than Trump, thus all other things being equal, Carlson's pupils under equal light conditions should be larger - not equal, let alone smaller - than Trump's pupils.

 

Are Donald Trump's Large Pupils a complication Cataract Surgery? 

This is highly doubtful



Cataracts are an entirely normal aging process. Virtually all 71-year-old people have at least mild evidence of cataracts (and certainly they may be moderate or advanced) and thus many will have cataract development to a degree for which surgery is indicated. And while it's not entirely clear if Trump has had cataract surgery, some of the available images online are physically close and with high enough resolution to suggest this is the case.

For several decades it's been considered at least a mild-to-moderate surgical complication to have a permanently dilated pupil (or partially/permanently/poorly reactive pupil) after cataract surgery. This complication can be thought of as a form of micro-trauma to the iris. Such findings are often a signal that other complications also occurred during surgery. While even in the best surgeon's hands, complications do occur, the likelihood that Trump had this complication in both eyes, is extremely unlikely - because each pupil constricts and contracts - a healthy quality.

Large pupils after cataract surgery often cause a lot of unwanted symptoms (e.g., glare, reflection, increased astigmatic effect, photophobia, etc.). It's possible that Trump has some of these symptoms, but probably not to any significant degree. Indeed, if the iris is damaged - leaving large pupils after cataract surgery, often a secondary procedure is performed to make the pupil smaller - thus minimizing any of the above-mention symptoms.

Trump's pupils are equal (or very closely so). And although they are often larger than normal, they do vary in size and are at times "within normal limits". This finding eliminates surgical complications as a cause of Trump's often larger pupil size. Pupils damaged as a result of surgery wouldn't respond in this manner.




In this image, his pupils are 3.5 - 4.0 mm (the slight difference in his pupil size [known as physiologic Anisocoria] is not significant or medically noteworthy - although certainly if one pupil was much larger or much smaller, it would be very important). So here we see that his pupils ARE indeed ABLE to contract to a smaller size - and this is crucial. But the question is - why are they intermittently so large, so often?


Are Trump's large pupils due to him deliberate dilating his own pupils with eye drops?  This is highly doubtful.

Medications such as Atropine, Scopolamine, Phenylephrine, Tropicamide, Homatropine, and Cyclopentolate are used to dilate pupils for ophthalmic examinations. These are also used to treat certain medical conditions in the eyes. Most notably these include various inflammatory conditions (Iritis, Uveitis, etc.). These conditions will often be correlated with diseases which frequently have serious ramifications for other parts of the body (thus may represent ophthalmic manifestations of systemic diseases).

Occasionally, people will deliberately dilate their pupils so as to feign a medical condition and thus seek attention (Munchausen syndrome). This is an extremely unlikely cause in the case of President Trump's pupils - for he always tries to present himself as extremely healthy.

Very uncommonly to rarely, a person will inadvertently get a bit of medication or a chemical compound in their eye which will dilate a pupil. There are even species of plants, which, upon gardening and then rubbing one's eye will have this effect. When this occurs, it will almost always effect only one eye - not both. Again, a long-term observation of Trump's eyes negates this possibility.


Are Trump's large pupils due to Trauma? This is highly doubtful

What about trauma? Could eye or head trauma cause a person's pupils to be large? Yes - but not in Trump's case.  Since Donald Trump's pupils change in size over time, and they are round (not irregular in shape) and equal in size - trauma can be eliminated as a cause.






What about a Disease or other Medical Condition?


Below is a list of medical causes of Enlarged Pupils, none of which applies in Trump's case, for multiple reasons, but in particular because his pupil size changes over time and also would have multiple other associated symptoms with any of these conditions.

Adie's Pupils, bilateral
Botulism
Cardiac Arrest
Cranial Nerve III (Oculomotor nerves), partial and bilateral,
Diabetes Mellitus
Diphtheria
Dysautonomia
Encephalitis
Guillain–BarrĂ© syndrome
Hypermagnesemia
Hypothermia
Increased Intracranial Pressure
Iris scaring (synechia) secondary to injury or inflammatory disease (Iritis/Uveitis)
Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Sarcoidosis
Sylvian Aqueduct Syndrome
Syphilis (Neurosyphilis)
Tumors/space occupying lesions
Venom from various poisonous animals (certain snakes, spiders, octopi, and fish)
Wernicke–Korsakoff syndrome





What about Medications/Drugs as a Cause of Trump's Large Pupils?

This cause is Highly Likely


Are Trump's large pupils caused by Systemic Drugs? (medications not used in eye drops [as mentioned above], but taken by mouth or by other means) - From a medical standpoint, this is highly probable.  Here's a of list of the possibilities (of course, anesthesia and those labeled with "poisoning" and "overdose" don't apply):



5-HT2A receptor-mediated psychedelic drugs
5-Hydroxytryptophan
Adrenaline
Amphetamines
Anesthesia (deep general anesthesia or near-total spinal anesthesia) 
Antidepressants such as (such as TCAs [overdosage], SSRIs, SNRIs, and MAOIs)
Antihistamine overdose
Barbiturates
Bretylium intoxication  
Chlorphentermine
Cocaine
Cyanide poisoning
Dopamine
Ephedrine
Fenfluramine
Glutathimide overdose
Methanol poisoning 
MDMA (Ecstasy)
Noradrenaline
Propranolol overdose
Quinine toxicity
Trimethaphan
Tryptophan overdose


Summary:
President Donald Trump's pupils are intermittently and significantly dilated - from a medical standpoint, this is NOT normal. The ambient light conditions cannot account for such changes. At other times they are within normal limits. This intermittent pattern is NOT due to trauma, complications from surgery, or disease. I have not examined Donald Trump and I have no firsthand knowledge of him - however, the myriad of photographic evidence available online seems to point strongly to the remaining possible etiology - Donald Trump's Intermittently Dilated Pupils are due to the side effects of drugs/medications.

Recent reports by journalist Kurt Eichenwald are consistent with this conclusion

I invite everyone to refute or confirm these medical findings - particularly those physicians with neuro-ophthalmology expertise.

I also suggest that an independent party set up a publicly available, online photo/video diary to chronologically highlight and monitor President Trump's pupils. 

Media Inquiries and Keynote Appearances 
One-on-One and Online Courses Available 
BodyLanguageEQ.com
Jack@BodyLanguageSuccess.com
702-239-8503

See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 4367: Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer Argue in the Oval Office - The Border Wall and Government Shutdown

Body Language Analysis No. 4374: Nancy Pelosi's Clap-Back to Donald Trump during the 2019 SOTU

Body Language Analysis No. 4219: Ivanka Trump's Reaction to Question regarding Donald Trump's Sexual Assault Accusers

Body Language Analysis No. 4373: Matthew Whitaker's Press Conference regarding Robert Mueller's Investigation

Body Language Analysis No. 4371: "Mr. President ... have you ever worked for Russia? Yes or no?" - Donald Trump's Reaction


Body Language Analysis No. 4370: Donald Trump, Fist-Pumping, and Vladimir Putin at 2017 G20

Body Language Analysis No. 4363: Ivanka Trump's GMA Interview

Body Language Analysis No. 4339: Pre-Confession Interview of Murderer, Chris Watts

Body Language Analysis No. 4347: Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings - Part I

Body Language Analysis No. 4325: Part III - Trump Putin Helsinki Summit Press Conference


_________________________________

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Body Language Analysis No. 4004: US Congressman Dana Rohrabacher asks NASA scientist about Civilizations on Mars - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)





Recently some NASA scientists were speaking before the US House of Representatives' Space Subcommittee, when Representative Dana Rohrabacher asked a rather peculiar question - fielded by Ken Farley, Ph.D. What follows is a transcript of this segment as well as a partial nonverbal analysis.

ROHRABACHER (beginning at 0:24): You have indicated that Mars, had a, ah, was totally different thousands of years ago. Ah, is it possible that there was a civilization, on Mars thousands of years ago?

FARLEY: So the evidence is that, ah, Mars was different Billions of years ago -

ROHRABACHER: [over-talking] Billions - well, yes, but ...

FARLEY: - not thousands of years ago, and, and, um, there would be - there is no evidence that, ahhh, I'm aware of, that would

ROHRABACHER: [over-talking] Would you rule, would you rule that out that - see there's some people, well, anyway [inaudible]

FARLEY: I would, I would say that is extremely unlikely.


During most of the time when Dr. Farley is speaking, he can be seen displaying a "Self-Righteous Head Wiggle" (aka "High Confidence Head Wiggle).

A Self-Righteous/High Confidence Head Wiggle (SRHW/HCHW) is a relatively rapid, side-to-side movements of the head and neck which is also often simultaneous with a similar movement of the torso (which is well exemplified here). Sometimes even the jaw is involved in an analog behavior.

This particular SRHW is relatively of relatively long duration (several seconds - waxing and waning) - although it's often a very short-lived behavior (e.g., a near-microexpression).

As its name implies, a Self-Righteous/High Confidence Head Wiggle is displayed by people who are in hyper-alpha moments of associated with strong emotions and high confidence. There's often an additional component of Hubris or Swagger

It's important to note that the SRHW/HCHW is a very dynamic body language signal - and is not captured with still images. Please view the video several times to appreciate the particular dynamics.

Although not present in these examples, the SRHW/HCHW may also sometimes have an additional superimposed backward movement (when disbelief, disgust, and/or contempt are accompanying emotions) - or a concomitant movement forward (when condescending or arrogant feelings are coexisting).

Although present to a relatively minimal degree here, the vocal pitch very often grows higher during the Self-Righteous/High Confidence Head Wiggle. The speed of Dr. Farley's speech more noticeably increases - keeping relative tempo with his head and torso oscillation. These two changes exemplify strong associations between body language and paralanguage.


Group Appearances and One-on-One
Online Courses Available 
702-239-8503
Jack@BodyLanguageSuccess.com

























See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 4003: Donald Trump, "Let Obamacare Fail"

Body Language Analysis No. 4001: Jodie Whittaker, Dr. Who, and Flirting from a TARDIS 

Body Language Analysis No. 3999: Donald Trump Jr., A Russian Lawyer, and Another Person in the Room

Body Language Analysis No. 3997: Donald Trump Jr., Natalia Veselnitskaya, and a Microexpression

Body Language Analysis No. 3994: Vladimir Putin at G20 - Donald Trump agreed with me

Body Language Analysis No. 3933: Sally Yates Testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee

Body Language Analysis No. 3974: Elle Fanning, Robert De Niro, and Easter

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3927: Jimmy Kimmel's Emotional Monologue regarding His Son’s Birth & Heart Disease

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3829: Mary Tyler Moore - Flirtatious, Sexy, Alpha Female Smile


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Body Language Analysis No. 3962: James Comey's Testimony - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)




The day of James Comey's long-awaited testimony finally arrived today. From a nonverbal communication perspective, one (of many) quality teaching moments occurred as Senator Mark Warner was questioning the former FBI Director.

What follows is a portion of their dialogue along with a partial body language analysis.

WARNER (continuing at 52:00): Now, you’ve had extensive experience at the Department of Justice and at the FBI. You’ve worked under presidents of both parties. What was it about that meeting that led you to determine that you needed to start putting down a written record?

COMEY: A combination of things, I think — the circumstances, the subject matter and the person I was interacting with. 

Circumstances first: I was alone, ah, with the president of the United States — or the president-elect, soon to be president.  

The subject matter: I was talking about matters that touch on the FBI’s core responsibility and that relate to the president — president-elect personally.  

And then the nature of the person: I was honestly concerned that he might lie about the nature of our meeting, and so I thought it really important to document.  

That combination of things, I’d never experienced before, but it led me to believe I’ve got to write it down, and I’ve got to write it down in a very detailed way.


Beginning at 52:40 until 52:45 as Mr. Comey said, "And then the nature of the person - I was honestly concerned that he might lie about the nature of our meeting...", Comey displayed an extended "Self-Righteous Head Wiggle" (SRHW).

The Self-Righteous Head Wiggle is a side-to-side moving of the head and neck - sometimes there's also a similar accompanying motion of the torso - or even the jaw (mandible). It can vary in duration - on occasion being extremely brief - ergo, a microexpression or near-microexpression - and at other times it's of longer duration. The amplitude and frequency also vary (In this example, Comey's SRHW lasts for about 5 seconds and is of relatively high frequency but low amplitude).

The Self-Righteous Head Wiggle is displayed during moments when the person is feeling high alpha emotions - and particularly high confidence when expressing such strong feelings (thus it's also on occasion referred to as a "High-Confidence Head Wiggle"). There is sometimes an element of accompanying swagger or smugness (although this component is not present here in Comey's display).

On occasion, the SRHW may also be coincident with an additional forward motion during moments when simultaneous arrogance is present. It can also have an accompanying backward motion - when contempt, disgust, and/or disbelief are being felt. However, neither of these variables (or feelings) are present in this segment.

Yet, an additional overlying movement which is seen here - is a repeated shoulder-shrug. In this context, a shrug indicates the thought emotions of: "What choice did I have?" or "What else could I do?"

These nonverbal displays are not able to be captured with still images. Please watch the video several times to appreciate the subtleties of these dynamic nonverbal signals.

Another co-existing expression is seen during 52:42, just after Comey says, "person" - he displays a classic expression of regret (image below).

























Summary: James Comey's nonverbal displays during this testimony are indicative of both high confidence and high sincerity. There is no deception present.


Group Appearances and One-on-One
Online Courses Available 
1-702-239-8503
Jack@BodyLanguageSuccess.com

See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 3961: Mike Rogers' Testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee

Body Language Analysis No. 3959: Vladimir Putin - Megyn Kelly Interview, Part II 

Body Language Analysis No. 3957: Sergei Gorkov, Jared Kushner, and Secret Meetings

Body Language Analysis No. 3955: Jeff Sessions, Russia, and Sergey Kislyak

Body Language Analysis No. 3953: Vladimir Putin and Emmanuel Macron meet in Versailles

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3921: Kim Jong-un, North Korea, Alpha Status, and Clapping

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3894: Michael Flynn and Russia - "When are given immunity, it means you probably committed a crime"

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3856: "Belle" Clip - Beauty and the Beast

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3809: Horse Lays His Head On Coffin As He Mourns The Loss Of His Human Best Friend - Cross-Species Body Language



_____________________________________________________________________________________

Sunday, May 14, 2017

Body Language Analysis No. 3938: Donald Trump regarding asking James Comey for his Loyalty - Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)






During his recent (12 May 2017) interview on Fox, Donald Trump was asked by Jeanine Pirro about his allegedly asking James Comey, for Comey's loyalty. This interview took place three days after the President fired the FBI Director.

What follows is a transcript of this portion of the interview, followed by a partial nonverbal and paralanguage analysis.

JEANINE PIRRO: People suggest that the question that - apparently The York Times is selling, that you asked Comey, whether or not you had his loyalty was - possibly inappropriate. W-, could you see how people could think that?

DONALD TRUMP (over-talking): No, I don't think, I read, I read that article. I don't think it's approp, inappropriate. The mor- [inaudible]

JEANINE PIRRO (over-talking): Did you ask that question?

DONALD TRUMP: No. No, I didn't. But I don't think it would be a bad question to ask. I think - loyalty to the country, loyalty to the United States is important. You know, I mean it depends on how you define a-, loyalty. Number one. Number two, I don't know how that got there - because - I didn't ask that question. 

JEANINE PIRRO: What about the idea that - in a tweet, you said that there might be tape recordings, well -

DONALD TRUMP (over-talking): Well - that I can't talk about. I won't talk about that. All I want is for Comey to be honest, and I hope he will be, and I'm sure he will be, I hope.



























During 0:31, as he says, "... because - I didn't ask that question ...", President Trump's face takes on an expression of forced (acted) incredulity. Thin-slicing this moment further:
  • Donald Trump's central forehead contracts and elevates (although significantly blunted secondary to the effects of Botox) 
  • His mouth configures in a hyperbolic, feigned smile (pulled more laterally rather than vertically, it's also asymmetrical - biased to his right side)
  • Simultaneously he glances, very briefly, up to HIS Left 
Donald Trump very rarely displays an elevated central forehead contraction (Elevated CFC). But when he does, his mouth is always displaying a partial, albeit false, smile component. In this particular example, his mouth display not only does not show any upper teeth (e.g., as with sincere smiles), moreover his mouth is melodramatically morphed. His forehead and mouth cluster display is an example of forced (acted) incredulity. This is overkill. This is melodrama.

Evaluating his gaze behavior: When right-hand dominant individuals (as is Trump) look up to their left, a very large percentage of the time (>95% in those who have been evaluated ["normed" or normalized] for their baseline behavior), they are visually recalling an event from the past which they witnessed. This indicates, with high probability, that President Trump did indeed ask James Comey for his personal loyalty.
























Note also, later in this segment, when Ms. Pirro asked the President about tape recordings, Trump looked to up and to HIS Right (0:39). When a right-hand dominant person looks up to his right, he is visually constructing an event in his mind. Why isn't Trump looking up to his left then? (Why is he not simply visually recalling the event?). He has to visually construct the event for one of two reasons:
  • It did not occur - ergo he's lying
          or
  • It did occur, BUT he was not there to see it 
With either scenario, he did not witness the alleged event, thus he's re-creating a visual "memory" of it. Since Trump was there with Comey, he would not have to construct a memory (If it was a true memory, he would simply have to recall it). Thus we are left with the conclusion that, with a very high probability, Donald Trump did not tape record (audio record) James Comey as he has suggested in his recent tweet.





















President Trump also displayed multiple paralanguage behaviors which are noteworthy. Here are two particularly glaring examples:
  • During 0:14, the President stutters saying, "I don't think it's approp, inappropriate."
  • When Ms. Pirro asks him a question regarding him allegedly asking for James Comey's loyalty, Donald Trump responds with statements about loyalty to the country. 

Summary:

Based on President Trump's nonverbal and paralanguage behavior during this interview segment, we can say with a high degree of confidence:
  • Donald Trump did indeed ask James Comey for his personal loyalty
  • The President did not record this conversation with then Director Comey. He is bluffing.

Group Appearances and One-on-One
Online Courses Available 
702-239-8503
Jack@BodyLanguageSuccess.com

See also:

Body Language Analysis No. 3397: Mr. Lavrov Goes To Washington - “Was he fired? You’re kidding!” - Sergey Lavrov, Rex Tillerson, and James Comey

Body Language Analysis No. 3395: Donald Trump and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the Oval Office

Body Language Analysis No. 3933: Sally Yates Testimony before Senate Judiciary Committee

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3930: Emmanuel Macron, Hacking, and Anger

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3923: John Boyega, Orlando Bloom, Swagger, and Alpha-Beta Balance

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3873: Brie Larson's Eyes, The Bachelor, and the Edge of Consciousness

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3843: 84 Lumber Super Bowl Ad - "The Entire Journey"

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3798: Elle Fanning, Channing Tatum and Dialing Up the Alpha

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3814: Claire Foy's recounting of Meeting Kate Winslet


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Monday, February 20, 2012

Negotiation Nonverbal Communication Secret # 1163:
The Importance of "Norming" in the
Evaluation of Body Language































Ma Ying-jeou, the President of the Republic of China (Taiwan) examples for us a basic and important premise in the science and art of Body Language - that of "Norming" - or in other words, establishing a baseline behavior. One reliable signal of insincerity is speaking out of the side of the mouth, however when people do it continuously (which is relatively unusual or even rare) - it is part of their normal, everyday behavior - part of their baseline personality. It also has similarity to an expression of contempt and may also be a metric of anxiety - depending on the other nonverbals with which it is clustered. Thus, it would be inaccurate to use this particular tell as an "insincerity, lie or contempt detector". Of course, such an individual may still be insincere, lying or contemptuous, but we just cannot use this signal to detect these acts in these people.

Ma Ying-jeou speaks out of the right side of his mouth so often, this is undoubtedly part of his normal baseline behavior.





















































































___________________________________________________________________________________