Showing posts with label Debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debate. Show all posts

Thursday, September 26, 2024

Body Language and Behavior Analysis No. 4763: Donald Trump's bizarre and predatory behavior (that you probably didn't notice) during the debate handshake with VP Kamala Harris – Nonverbal and Emotional Intelligence


There were multitudes of body language displays – as well as verbal and paralanguage behaviors – exhibited during their first handshake. One behavior in particular exhibited by Donald Trump during his handshake with Vice President Harris that was especially bizarre – did you see it?

The image shown above shows a wide-angle view of the behavior in question.
 

... and here's a close-up of that same moment:


Donald Trump's right index finger is extended up onto the inside (volar aspect) of Vice President Harris' wrist. It's not gripping her hand as is the universal custom around the world.

When, upon meeting someone, we extend our hand, it's a form of implied consent (i.e., I'm extending my hand in an invitation of greeting in hopes [and expectation] that you extend yours, so that we may shake hands).

And although, in certain cultures and contexts there are exceptions, in most all countries and in most all contexts throughout the world, the implied consent by a handshake does not give further consent to other bodily touching.

Donald Trump extended his finger up Vice President Kamala Harris' wrist (between the cuff of her shirt and the cuff of her jacket) as a deliberate, invasive, predatory, and sexual innuendo – in an attempt to intimidate and unnerve the Vice President.

Regardless of the other oddities of this handshake (see below), this particular invasive touching is not a component of a normal or acceptable handshake by any stretch of the imagination.

Had the Vice President been wearing a shorter sleeve – or had she not been wearing a non-flexible bracelet, it would have allowed Trump to be even more invasive by touching further down the skin of her wrist.   

The wrist is a particularly sensitive area and a body part that should not be touched without consent.

The index finger on the dominant hand (Trump's right hand and, of course, the shaking hand by convention) is the most powerful digit on either hand. 

Moreover, the significance of an extended index finger as a phallic symbol in this context is entirely deliberate. And although it's certainly not sexual assault, it's absolutely intended to intimidate and make Vice President Harris feel violated. It is predatory.

If ever you've been on the receiving end of this variety of invasive handshake, you'll probably remember feeling creeped-out.

So while consent to touching the other person's hand in the context of a handshake is, of course, implied and expected – touching them in other places is not. In some countries and situations, there are exceptions, but this was certainly not one of them.

By Trump breaking this norm in this way gives him plausible deniability for violating personal space, trying to intimidate, and predatory behavior.

Now zoom-out and look at the relative positions of Trump's and Harris' hands and arms relative to their torsos. Trump virtually always pulls women's hands both upward and close to his upper torso/lower chest during handshakes:


Men who consistently shake other men's hands with this in-pulling and/or up-pulling are narcissistic and manipulative...

... And men who shake women's hands using this dynamic are not only narcissistic and manipulative – they're also misogynistic, objectifying the women, and have a predilection of violence toward women.

As has been widely pointed out, Trump did not anticipate a handshake from the Vice President, caught off-guard he hesitated, slowing his approach onto the stage, and was trying to decide whether to shake hands in front of or behind his lectern.
 

 


His hesitation (possibly momentary disorientation) was classic low confidence behavior – which further primed Trump toward a state of emotional discomfort.

There are some who might say that by walking slowly, Trump forced Harris into a subordinate position – necessitating her to approach him. This is incorrect.

In this context, Harris' pace, energy, and early start on stage exemplified Harris' energy and initiative – in a word: Presidential.

Vice President Harris also spoke first – introducing herself with a confident and assertive tone as well as with proper volume saying, "Kamala Harris. Let's have a good debate", while Trump mumbled, "Nice to see ya [sic]. Have fun." Harris answered back, "Thank you."

While there are exceptions, in the vast majority of situations, and certainly in a debate scenario, if you want to project authority and confidence (i.e., be presidential), initiate the handshake – and introduce yourself. Donald Trump did neither of these.

Trump physically hesitated, mumbled, and took refuge behind his lectern.

And you've probably heard – until the debate,
 these two had never met (Note: because Donald Trump chose not to attend the 2020 Presidential Inauguration).

SUMMARY:  Donald Trump, directed his index finger down-the-wrist of VP Kamala Harris. This was a sexual innuendo. This was predatory. It was an invasive and deliberate attempt to unnerve and intimidate the Vice President. It didn't work.

Trump's standard handshake MO of pulling a woman's hand-arm both disproportionately toward him as well as upward indicates his:

• Narcissism
• Manipulative personality
• Misogyny
• Objectification of women
• Predilection of violence toward women

Trump was caught off-guard by Harris' approach, strength, assertiveness, and authority. She was presidential and he was not. He hesitated, walked slowly, retreated behind his lectern, mumbled, spoke with low-volume, and never introduced himself. ...

Inquiries re consulting, teaching (one-on-one or groups), keynotes, and press: Jack@BodyLanguageSuccess.com

Ω

Thursday, May 4, 2017

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3928: Marine Le Pen and Emmanuel Macron Debate - Body Language Mistakes and Emotional Intelligence (PHOTOS)






















The run-off (second round) of the French Presidential election will be held on Sunday. Marine Le Pen trails Emmanuel Macron in the polls by about 18 percentage points. The two candidates squared off in a televised debate yesterday.  Le Pen certainly has more political experience - and is generally considered a more skilled debater, but by most accounts the debate was a draw.






One nonverbal (and a near absolute) debate mistake - is the touching of one's face. With rare exception, facial touching during a debate, a speech, and interview - or any kind of public appearance - should never be performed. The audience (even an audience of one) will interpret this as suspicious and often deceptive (even if they have no formal nonverbal training) - and a significantly high percentage of the time, they'd be correct.

Marine Le Pen displayed facial touching at multiple times during this debate.

























Another mistake Le Pen made was using a "Pseudoprayer hand-chop". This conveys a patronizing and condescending emotional tone - and while its use tends to solidify the connections/strength of commitment with those who already are followers - people who are undecided (and also those who already disagree) will become alienated (or more alienated) upon seeing the pseudoprayer hand-chop.

Thus, the pseudoprayer hand-chop is one of many nonverbal signals which, while often will make its user feel more assertive and alpha - it also simultaneously acts as a rapport destroyer to their audience.

Summary: From a nonverbal perspective, Emmanuel Macron significantly outperformed Marine Le Pen in their Wednesday debate. Ms. Le Pen also displayed multiple signals consistent with deception.


See also:

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3927: Jimmy Kimmel's Emotional Monologue regarding His Son’s Birth & Heart Disease

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3925: An Expression of Donald Trump's Which He's Making More Often

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3923: John Boyega, Orlando Bloom, Swagger, and Alpha-Beta Balance

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3921: Kim Jong-un, North Korea, Alpha Status, and Clapping 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3884: One Important Expression James Comey Displayed Often During His Testimony Before the House Intelligence Committee

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3876: John McCain's "State of the Union" Interview re: Donald Trump, Michael Flynn, Wiretap Allegations and Russia

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3843: 84 Lumber Super Bowl Ad - "The Entire Journey"

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3814: Claire Foy's recounting of Meeting Kate Winslet


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Thursday, October 27, 2016

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3737: Donald Trump Rips His Notes at End of 3rd Debate - Body Language and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)





Last week, during the very end of the Third Presidential Debate, a secondary camera captured a relative close up Donald Trump's facial expression as Hillary Clinton walked to moderator Chris Wallace and shook his hand. Although this six-second video is of somewhat low resolution - it's profoundly telling.






























As Mr. Trump rips some of his note pages apart his jaw juts forward - first skewed to his left. 






























A slit-second later his jut juts to his right. In this context (with the other coexisting nonverbal signals) this is a strong indication of anger.






























Then his head tilts slightly backward, his mid-face tightens (more so on his left), his nostrils flare (also greater on his left) and his eyebrows are drawn together as they vector downward. His face is primarily expressing contempt - with secondary emotions of disgust and anger.






























In this next moment, Trump's head/neck tilt back further, his eyebrows elevate - as his eyelids partially close (amplifying his negative contempt and disgust). His mid-face and mouth are relatively unchanged (increased contempt and disgust with less anger).
























And in the last second of the video, as Secretary Clinton walks in front of him - Mr. Trump displays what was perhaps the most telling expression of the night - a classic expression of regret.

This cluster of rapid nonverbal displays is a manifestation emotional release after being pent-up for 90 minutes. We are for a few moments seeing very clearly Mr. Trump's true feelings. It's a phenomenon also seen in actors after they 'come out of character' from a particularly intense scene.


See also:

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3736: Newt Gingrich and Megyn Kelly re: Donald Trump

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3734: SNL's spoof on the 3rd Presidential Debate - and 3 Insincerity Flags

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3731: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part III - "Such a Nasty Woman"

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3728: Barack Obama Tells Donald Trump to Stop Whining

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3715: Mike Pence Denies Saying Vladimir Putin is a Better Leader

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3707: The Presidential Debates Part III - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton and Sniffing 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3654: Hope Solo Calls Swedish Team "Cowards" after US Loss in Rio 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3622: Theresa May's First Speech as Prime Minister



_____________________________________________________________________________________

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3734: SNL's spoof on the 3rd Presidential Debate - and 3 Insincerity Flags - Body Language and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)





Once again Saturday Night Live delivered another hilarious performance of Kate McKinnon as Hillary Clinton and Alec Baldwin as Donald Trump - this one satirizing the final 2016 Presidential Debate of three nights prior in Las Vegas, Nevada. Guest Tom Hanks even played moderator Chris Wallace.

As expected, all three actors did an amazing job - not only did they 'bring the funny', but they uncannily replicated the three characters ... and some of their flaws.

What follows are some particular nonverbal signals by Hanks, McKinnon and Baldwin acting as Wallace, Clinton and Trump - and these expressions captured elements of insincerity that Chris, Hillary and Donald routinely project.
























If we were working with Chris Wallace, we'd be telling him to not speak out of the side of his mouth. While some people do this routinely as an idiosyncrasy (or facial tic) - it's statistically relatively unusual. Medical causes - such as peripheral facial nerve palsy or stroke are potential causes which should be considered.

Depending on the other nonverbal signs with which it's clustered, asymmetrical speaking can also indicate an admission of fault or acquiescence. Much more commonly however, particularly when being interviewed on TV or in some other significant spotlight - speaking out of the side of the mouth is a signal of bravado and/or insincerity (the Venn diagrams of which overlap). Tom Hanks does a fantastic job capturing Wallace's mouth movements.

























One question I routinely get asked is, "What the most important nonverbal signal to look for when assessing for insincerity?" Of course, the nonverbal tells of insincerity are many, however the most common one is an over-use of the forehead muscles (both in amplitude and in frequency). It's also very common, although not required, that excessively opened upper eyelids often accompany such over contracted forehead displays.

Now of course, in the context of an emotional debate, it's normal that people will open their eyes wide and elevate their forehead muscles when emphasizing a particularly important opinion or recommended course of action. And although Secretary Clinton has improved this body language faux pas of late, she did slip back into this previous pattern multiple times. She tends to do worse on this issue during her speeches and interviews - and improves when it comes to debates.

When people over-use their forehead muscles, they are trying to hard to sell you a thing or more commonly an idea/opinion.

Kate McKinnon was spot on.



























It's hard to believe, but Alec Baldwin improved even further in his near perfect portrayal of Donald Trump. One striking pattern Trump has - is a very low variability of his facial expressions. Said another way, his face goes into its default settings easily and routinely - which acts as a living mask. The expressions he does make tend to be more extreme - but the overall variety of his expressions are relatively minimal. Depression and other conditions of a blunted affect are possible causes to consider when we see faces adopting these physiologic masks - but it's also is a method some psyches use to minimize mental workload - thus making it much easier to multitask - and therefore to also tell lies. Insincerity takes more work - and if one's face isn't moving quite as frequently, this frees up more mental energy for deception.

Summary: Tom Hanks, Kate McKinnon and Alec Baldwin near perfectly portray Chris Wallace, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump - and in so doing, also accurately captured some of their classic insincerity signals.


See also:

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3733: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part IV - The Turning Point of the Debate

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3731: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part III - "Such a Nasty Woman"

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3729: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part I - Vladimir Putin, Body Language & Emotional Intelligence 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3718: Donald Trump's "Access Hollywood" Hot Mic Video

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3699: The Tulsa Police and the Shooting Death of Terence Crutcher

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3669: Jordan Spieth, Bill Murray and the Asymmetrical Smile

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3610: Star Swain sings The Star-Spangled Banner at the Lincoln Memorial - Why Do Singers Close Their Eyes?

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3574: Selena Gomez's Body Language Reaction to Fans in Montreal


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3733: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part IV - The Turning Point of the Debate - Body Language and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)





What was the turning point of the third Presidential Debate? Did you see it? It came about 20 minutes after the candidates were introduced. What follows is a partial nonverbal analysis and a glimpse inside Donald Trump's emotional mind.

Hillary Clinton (beginning at 0:15 in the above video): "... Getting rid of any violent person, anybody who should be deported, we should deport them. When it comes to the wall that Donald talks about building - he went to Mexico - had a meeting with the Mexican president. He didn't even raise it. He choked. And then got into a Twitter war because the Mexican president said we're not paying for that wall... "

During 0:31 - 0:33 as Secretary Clinton says, "... And then got into a Twitter war because the Mexican president said ...", (coming just after Trump processes the "He Choked" statement), Donald Trump displays a truly classic example of a subtle expression of contempt. Some may falsely label this a microexpression, and although it is certainly short-lived (lasting about 1.7 seconds), it's technically too long to be classified as such. Don't get hung-up on this definition though - for the significance of this subtle expression of contempt is just as significant as that of a microexpression.



























Watch it at regular speed and then at 1/2 and even 1/4 speed - then once again at regular speed. It's quite illustrative to view it with the sound muted as well.

























Also of note, is that Trump briefly closes his eyelids in an extended blink during this display. In this context, this dynamic is a contempt amplifier. It also acts as a flag to careful observers. Moreover, when Trump opens his eyelids - he's looking down to his right - the quadrant right-hand dominant people tend to gaze toward much more often when the emotions of regret, sadness, self-criticism are present. Trump knows that he committed a big mistake.


























This is the exact moment when the debate turned. This is when Hillary Clinton got under Donald Trump's skin. Prior to this exchange Trump was more composed, polished and well spoken. So not only is this a text-book classic example of a subtle expression of contempt - but it also serves to illustrate just how our performance in any activity, particularly when it involves communication, can be dramatically altered when we let it throw us off our emotional-baseline.

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3733: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part IV - The Turning Point of the Debate - Body Language and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

See also:

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3732: Donald Trump cuts short interview after Question Regarding Racism - Predicting Trump's Behavior

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3724: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Emotional Intelligence and a Profoundly Telling Body Language Signal

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3720: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Predatory Behavior

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3714: Vice Presidential Debate - Tim Kaine v. Mike Pence

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3702: Hillary Clinton: "Why aren't I 50 points ahead (of Trump)?''

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3693: Grace VanderWaal Wins America's Got Talent Season 11

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3683: Brock Turner Released from Prison after 3 Months

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 2313: Elisa Lam Video in Elevator at Cecil Hotel - What Her Body Language Tells Us

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3679: Donald Trump, Enrique Peña Nieto and The Wall 


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Friday, October 21, 2016

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3731: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part III - "Such a Nasty Woman" - Body Language and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)





Earlier this week, during 2016's third Presidential Debate, each candidate interrupted the other multiple times - yet this is the one you probably will remember ten years from now:

Chris Wallace: Secretary Clinton, same question because at this point Social Security and Medicare are going to run out -- the trust funds are going to run out of money. Will you, as president, consider a grand bargain, a deal that includes both tax increases and benefit cuts to try to save both programs?

Hillary Clinton: Well, Chris, I am record as saying we need to put more money into Social Security Trust fund. That's part of my commitment to raise taxes on the wealthy. My Social Security payroll contribution will go up as will Donald's assuming he can't figure out how to get out of it, but what we want to do is - 

Donald Trump [over-talking]: Such a nasty woman.

Hillary Clinton: Replenish the trust fund by making sure that we have sufficient resources, and that will come from either raising the cap and/or finding other ways to get more money into it...

What follows is a nonverbal snapshot into Mr. Trump's psyche just prior to - and just after his declaration.


























In the image above (captured during 0:19 of the above video), just prior to his "Such a Nasty Woman" statement, Mr. Trump is displaying a classic expression of contempt - with a slight upturn in the left mouth corner, a tightening of his left mustache area and a trace flaring of his left nostril.

An eyelid closure (here bilateral), while not required in this particular contempt expression (for there are other nonverbal varieties for this emotion) is, in this context, a contempt amplifier. This principle also holds true for a partial eyelid closure. Because of it's very short duration, this is also classified as a microexpression.



























Donald Trump's second expression of contempt - just after his interruption (0:23) - is not as pronounced, however it's longer in duration.



























With the addition of an elevated central forehead contraction, Trump's expression quickly (0:24) morphs into one of contempt mixed with incredulity. 

Please watch the video to more fully appreciate the dynamic and evanescent nature of this nonverbal moment.

See also:

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3730: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part II - Donald Trump won't commit to accepting election results

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3728: Barack Obama Tells Donald Trump to Stop Whining

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3726: Donald Trump Accuser - Kristin Anderson

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3717: Creepy Clowns, Body Language and Emotional Intelligence

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3697: NYC Bombing Suspect Ahmad Khan Rahami in Custody

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3687: Katy Perry Surprises Fan-Survivor of Orlando Nightclub Shooting on Ellen 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3662: Weverton Dives, Neymar Kicks and Brazil Wins Gold 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3542: Lara Croft, Keeley Hawes, Sexual Energy and Body Language


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3730: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part II - Donald Trump won't commit to accepting election results - Body Language and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)





Last night, toward the end of the third Presidential Debate of the 2016 Election, Moderator Chris Wallace asked Donald Trump about whether or not he would commit to accepting the results of the election. The video above is a segment of that exchange - and what follows is a partial nonverbal analysis.

Chris Wallace (beginning at 0:47): ".... there is a tradition in this country, in fact, one of the prides of this country is the peaceful transition of power and no matter how hard fought a campaign is - that at the end of the campaign, that the loser concedes to the winner. Not saying you're necessarily going to be the loser or the winner - but that the loser concedes to the winner and the country comes together in part for the good of the country. Are you saying you're not prepared now to commit to that principle?"

Donald Trump: [over-talking] "What I’m saying is that I will tell you at the time. I'll keep you in suspense, okay?"

Hillary Clinton: [over-talking] "Well Chris, let me respond to that because that’s horrifying. You know, every time Donald thinks things aren't going in his direction, he claims whatever it is, is rigged against him ..."



















From 1:13 through 1:19 (corresponding with red highlighted dialog above), Donald Trump displays a very specific nonverbal expression. Despite the fact that it's not uncommon - this facial tell is rarely discussed and it's under appreciated in the nonverbal literature.

In the wide frame above and in the close up below (captured a few seconds apart), we can see that Mr. Trump's eyebrows are momentarily elevated (along with his forehead muscles) - and yet, his upper eyelids, rather than being raised as well - are tightened and significantly more closed. This facial expression is indicative of arrogance, contempt and a patronizing emotional tone.




























See also:

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3729: The 3rd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Part I - Vladimir Putin, Body Language & Emotional Intelligence 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3727: Donald Trump and Children

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3725: Donald Trump Challenges Hillary Clinton to a Drug Test before Debate


Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3720: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Personal Space and Predatory Behavior 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3712: Lloyd Bentsen to Dan Quayle - "You're No Jack Kennedy" 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3699: The Tulsa Police and the Shooting Death of Terence Crutcher 

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3657: Abbey D'Agnostino, Nikki Hamblin and the Olympic Spirit

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3502: Chicago Cubs' Kris Bryant Pranks a College Team as ‘The Transfer’ - Body Language


_____________________________________________________________________________________

Sunday, October 16, 2016

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3725: Donald Trump Challenges Hillary Clinton to a Drug Test before Debate - Body Language and Emotional Intelligence (VIDEO, PHOTOS)





Today after saying Hillary Clinton is getting "pumped up", Donald Trump challenged her to a drug test prior to Wednesday's Presidential Debate in Las Vegas.
























At multiple times during his statement, Donald Trump displays a jaw jut. While a jaw jut often accompanies anger - there are no other nonverbal (or verbal, or paralanguage) signals of anger in this message.

When a jaw jut is seen outside the context of anger (depending on the other nonverbal signs with which it is clustered), it indicates bravado and hubris - and it's these emotions Mr. Trump was feeling throughout this segment (and yet he felt another ... ).


























During 0:15, just after he says, "Let's see", Trump displays a Loose Forward Tongue Jut (aka Lizard Tongue) - as he launches is challenge. This nonverbal symbol is significant for the emotions of "I've been bad" and/or "I've been caught".


Summary:

Today Donald Trump challenged Hillary Clinton to Pre-Debate drug test. In so doing, he displayed particular hubris and bravado - however he also believes he's been bad and has been caught.


See also:

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3724: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Emotional Intelligence and a Profoundly Telling Body Language Signal

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3722: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - One Positive Thing They Respect about Each Other

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3720: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3714: Vice Presidential Debate - Tim Kaine v. Mike Pence

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3708: Hillary Clinton v. Donald Trump - Presidential Debates - Part IV - Hillary's Email Anxiety

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3670: Paul LePage's Voicemail Rant

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3609: Emma Watson, Tina Turner, Ring Tones and Body Language

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3578: Megan Fox, Body Language and Dismissive Emotions



_____________________________________________________________________________________

Saturday, October 15, 2016

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3724: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - Emotional Intelligence and a Profoundly Telling Body Language Signal (VIDEO, PHOTOS)





During the Second 2016Presidential Debate (in the video above, from 57:08 - 57:12), Donald Trump can be seen displaying in a very particular Body Language cluster-configuration.

Mr. Trump, with his feet in a wide stance, leans laterally left with his weight shifted, his left arm wide with his left hand is on the back of his chair, his right thumb is hooked inside his belt (or pants) with the remainder of his hand hanging loosely over his central, lower abdomen. Moreover during 57:10 Trump pulls up on his belt-pants in this central region - in a False Adjustment maneuver. He's also "Whole Body Pointing" toward Hillary Clinton.

Mr. Trump did something similar (but even more dramatic) last November when refuting a story of Ben Carson's (See: Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3375: Donald Trump Questions Ben Carson's Stabbing Story).

In body language parlance, this is an example of a "MAP Surrogate" (Manipulator, Adaptor, Pacifier) - as well as a variation of a Partial Emblematic Slip. This dramatic act is very out of context for anyone on stage (other than during a true drama/play) and certainly during any kind of a political debate. This a Hyper-Alpha Sexual Display with Donald Trump attempting to project dominance and virility.
























See also:

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3723: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3721: The 2nd Presidential Debate - Donald Trump v. Hillary Clinton - The Handshake That Wasn't

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3719: Donald Trump's "Apology" - Crisis Management, Body Language and Emotional Intelligence

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3716: Fatherhood, Body Language, Emotional Intelligence and Ashton Kutcher's Pants

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3711: Vin Scully calls Kirk Gibson's legendary walk-off homer during Game 1 of the 1988 World Series

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3706: Hillary Clinton v. Donald Trump Presidential Debates - Part II

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3704: Hillary Clinton, Likability and Presidential Debates

Nonverbal Communication Analysis No. 3611: Salma Hayek, Danny Trejo and a Tattoo


_____________________________________________________________________________________